Skip to main content

Abstract

We show that CEOs of prestigious firms earn less. Total compensation is on average 8% lower for firms listed in Fortune's ranking of America's most admired companies. We suggest that CEOs are willing to trade off status and career benefits from working for a publicly admired company against additional monetary compensation. Our identification strategy is based on matched sample analyses, difference-in-differences regressions, and a regression discontinuity design. We perform several robustness checks and exclude many alternative explanations, including that firm prestige just proxies for better corporate governance, or for increased exposure of the pay-setting process to media attention.

 


 

Published in

Journal of Financial Economics
Florens Focke, Ernst Maug, Alexandra Niessen-Ruenzi
Volume 123, Number 2, pp. 313-336, January 2017

Related Working Papers

Subscribe