Skip to main content

Through his lens as an economist and regulator, Professor Mathias Dewatripont provided an insightful briefing at the 2024 ECGI Annual Conference, exploring the intersections of corporate culture, banking regulation, and governance. Dewatripont emphasized the dual role of banking: as a critical yet inherently risky component of the economy. He began by recounting his foundational work with Jean Tirole, which conceptualized the governance of firms, particularly banks, through the lens of incomplete contract theory. This theory underscored the unique challenges in banking, where the typical creditor-shareholder dynamic is distorted due to the reliance on insured depositors as debt holders, necessitating a robust framework of regulation, supervision, and resolution (RSR).

He traced the evolution of banking regulation from Basel I to Basel III, highlighting its attempts to replicate traditional creditor control mechanisms to mitigate risks such as "gambling for resurrection." Despite these advancements, Dewatripont acknowledged persistent issues, such as banks' high leverage ratios, particularly in Europe, where the gap between leverage and capital ratios has grown due to reliance on internal risk models. He called for consistency in aligning banks' professed sustainability goals with their risk management practices, emphasizing the role of regulatory reforms.

The presentation delved into governance and culture, particularly the impact of shareholder-oriented incentives on risk-taking behaviors. Dewatripont criticized the prevalent compensation structures in banking, which often prioritize shareholder value over firm or societal value. He cited the European Banking Authority's data on high earners to illustrate the disparity in remuneration between retail and investment banking, arguing that this misalignment undermines efforts toward fostering a sustainable and responsible banking culture.

Drawing parallels with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Dewatripont noted that banking regulation, despite its narrower scope, offers lessons for broader ESG ambitions. He stressed the need for simplicity and harmonization in regulatory frameworks to avoid excessive complexity, advocating for systemic incentives like carbon taxes and clean energy subsidies to align corporate and societal objectives.

The discussion extended to alternative corporate structures, such as benefit corporations, to mitigate the inherent conflicts in shareholder-driven governance. Dewatripont acknowledged the challenges in balancing accountability and societal impact, urging a focus on practical reforms like aligning tax and regulatory systems with societal goals before overhauling corporate structures. He concluded with a call for translating broad ESG and cultural objectives into actionable and measurable indicators, emphasizing the importance of clarity and focus in fostering effective governance and sustainable practices.

Dewatripont’s presentation offered a nuanced analysis of how corporate culture, governance, and regulatory frameworks intersect in banking and beyond, advocating for coherent incentives, practical reforms, and cultural consistency to navigate the challenges of modern corporate governance.

_______________

This article is Part Two of a seven-part blog series covering insights and reflections from the 2024 ECGI Annual Conference

Explore the rest of the posts: read Part One, read Part Three, read Part Four, read Part Five, read Part Six, and read Part Seven.

This article features in the ECGI blog collection Corporate Culture

Related Blogs

Scroll to Top