This website uses cookies to help us give you the best experience when you visit our website. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies.
Read more
We analyze how 14,000 US top executives exercise their stock options. Factors suggested by existing theories have low or moderate explanatory power. Variables that model executives’ motive to diversify fare particularly poorly, whereas variables that capture reference-dependent preference, such as past highs and lows of stock prices, perform better.
By contrast, characteristics of option portfolios are of firstorder importance and suggest that managers have target ownership levels. Institutional features like vesting restrictions or blackout periods also have a first-order impact. We conclude that executives’ main motivations for exercising stock options early seem to be outside the scope of extant models.
The only profit-seeking business enterprises chartered by a federal government agency are banks. Yet, there is barely any scholarship justifying this...
Recent research shows that a high wage gap between managers and workers identifies better-performing firms, but the stock market does not seem to price...
This paper develops a theory of blockholder governance and the voting premium. A blockholder and dispersed shareholders first trade in a competitive...