Why Do Businesses Incorporate in Other EU Member States? An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Conflict of Laws Rules

Why Do Businesses Incorporate in Other EU Member States? An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Conflict of Laws Rules

Carsten Gerner-Beuerle, Federico M. Mucciarelli, Edmund-Philipp Schuster, Mathias Siems

Series number :

Serial Number: 
361/2017

Date posted :

August 03 2017

Last revised :

August 05 2017
SSRN Suggested citation Download this paper Open PDF Share

Keywords

  • freedom of establishment • 
  • market for incorporations • 
  • corporate mobility • 
  • conflict of laws • 
  • pri-vate international law

Research in law, political science and economics has taken a strong interest in the way companies strategically incorporate in foreign jurisdictions.

However, the empirical research about corporate mobility in the EU has so far been limited in two respects: it has focussed on the analysis of foreign companies in the UK and it has mainly been concerned with differences in the costs of incorporation such as minimum capital requirements. This paper aims to fill these gaps. It is the first paper that presents data on incorporations of foreign businesses in the commercial registers of each EU Member State. It is also the first one to assess the impact of differences in the conflict of laws rules applicable to companies as they reflect the case law of the Court of Justice on the freedom of establishment. It finds that countries which have a clear-cut version of the ‘incorporation theory’ attract more incorporations than countries which have retained elements of the ‘real seat theory’. The paper also discusses the policy implications that follow from these findings for EU harmonisation in this field.

Authors

Real name:
Carsten Gerner-Beuerle
Real name: 
Edmund-Philipp Schuster